Embarrassing plan to save Melania’s new film as she is mocked online over empty theaters

A Vanity Project Meets Reality

In late January 2026, Melania — a high‑budget documentary about First Lady Melania Trump — premiered in U.S. theaters nationwide. Backed by Amazon MGM Studios in a deal reportedly worth around $75 million in rights, marketing, and distribution, the movie was marketed as a personal, behind‑the‑scenes look at Melania Trump’s life surrounding her husband’s second presidential inauguration.

Despite heavy promotion — including public comments from President Donald Trump calling it a “must‑watch” — the documentary has struggled to find an audience, with widespread reports of empty theaters and poor advance ticket sales.

Rather than easing as showtime approached, the narrative around the film quickly shifted from promotional buzz to online mockery and box office embarrassment.

🎟️ Box Office Reality: Empty Seats and Poor Sales
Advance Sales Underwhelming

Before the film was even released, social media users began posting screenshots of empty screening times at large theater chains — often showing zero tickets sold for multiple showings in major U.S. cities, including New York, Jacksonville, and Boston.

In some cases, venues reported only one or two tickets sold, and commentators online pointed out that even theaters near Melania’s personal locales (like Palm Beach) were “practically empty.”

One viral example involved a screenshot of a Boston showing where no one had bought a single ticket, fueling jokes that the film might be “a movie for ghosts.”

Opening Weekend Performance

When Melania finally hit theaters on January 30, the performance was still far below expectations. While the movie did manage roughly $7 million in box office revenue, multiple independent analyses and projections had originally estimated much lower returns — possibly as little as $1–$5 million — for such a wide release.

Independent data also indicated most of the reported box office income could have come from a few bulk buys or discounted screenings, raising questions about the legitimacy of these numbers.

In the U.K., Melania debuted at a low position — about No. 29 on local box office charts — with modest per‑screen averages, reinforcing the narrative of lukewarm global interest.

Audience Reaction and Review Bombing

Audiences and critics alike have been sharp in their responses. On user‑generated sites such as IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, scores dipped into historically low territory, with Melania becoming one of the lowest‑rated films in recent memory on some platforms.

Social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit turned the ticket price screenshots and memes into fodder for ridicule, with review bombing and negative commentary dominating public perception.

🧨 Online Mockery and Cultural Backlash
Late‑Night TV and Parodies

TV hosts and comedians have joined the chorus of critics. Stephen Colbert shared screenshots of empty showings and joked that the film offered “a real peek behind the curtain at a woman picking out curtains” — a mocking reference to the documentary’s supposed depth.

Similarly, Saturday Night Live produced parody segments that riffed on Melania’s accent and the documentary’s premise, pushing the narrative that cultural institutions viewed the film as ripe material for satire.

Comedian Jimmy Kimmel also ridiculed Melania, comparing its commercial prospects to notorious flops and pointing out that many within the production crew requested not to be credited.

Social Media Memes and Commentary

Across Reddit, X, and other platforms, users shared dozens of memes and jokes. These ranged from light‑hearted commentary about the empty theaters to harsher critiques of the movie’s perceived propaganda value.

Some comments suggested that Melania felt “like a bribe or propaganda piece” rather than a documentary with genuine artistic or narrative merit.

Others focused on mechanics of the production — questioning creative choices, the decision to hire controversial director Brett Ratner (who faced past misconduct allegations), and the overall purpose and timing of the film.

📣 The Embarrassing “Rescue” Plan

Faced with growing embarrassment, a plan began circulating online and in industry buzz aimed at boosting attendance and filling seats by unconventional means. This strategy — whether official or mostly satirical — represents a fascinating blend of optics management and desperation:

1. Paid Fill‑Ins and Incentives

One of the most talked‑about ideas involves paying people to attend screenings.

An advertisement — widely shared (and possibly satirical or fake) — surfaced on Craigslist offering *$50 cash to individuals willing to sit through a screening of Melania.

Whether genuine or a joke, the concept quickly became symbolic online of a last‑ditch attempt to manufacture attendance figures. Even critics acknowledged that paying viewers to show up might technically raise the headcount, but would do little to overcome the underlying lack of genuine interest.

2. Bulk Ticket Purchases & Theater Buyouts

Another strategy floated by political allies reportedly involved bulk purchases of tickets by sympathetic organizations and fundraisers to create the impression of stronger attendance.

According to some reports, groups aligned with conservative causes may have been mobilizing to buy out screenings or distribute free tickets to supporters in an attempt to bolster box office results.

This tactic carries risk: if tickets are purchased but seats remain unfilled, social media screenshots of empty theaters might still circulate — further harming the film’s reputation.

3. Marketing Stunts and Discounted Deals

A more conventional — but still fraught — approach includes offering promotions like discounted tickets, bundled concessions, or branded merchandise giveaways to entice audiences who might otherwise not attend.

While such tactics are typical in struggling movies, they have an ironic sting here: given how heavily the film was already promoted and funded, cheap ticket deals could signal desperation rather than success.

4. Streaming Push Instead of Theatrical Focus

Some commentators argued that the film should have prioritized streaming release over a traditional theatrical window. Since the documentary is backed by Amazon — which owns Prime Video — transitioning Melania to streaming sooner might have allowed it to find an audience without the glare of box office comparisons.

This suggestion acknowledges that many viewers prefer digital access anyway, and that a theatrical release might have set unrealistic expectations for what was essentially a high‑budget prestige documentary.

5. “Optics” Strategic Messaging

Behind the scenes, political operatives might attempt to reframe the narrative away from box office numbers toward cultural impact, critical discussion, or political messaging.

Rather than touting sold‑out theaters, supporters could promote quotes, interviews, or social media clips during the film’s release timeline to bolster visibility. While this wouldn’t change seat counts, it could shift the perception of success from numeric measures to engagement metrics.

📊 Economic and Cultural Implications
Commercial Failure or Narrative Success?

From a pure business perspective, Melania was not the blockbuster that the $75 million combined investment would have hoped for. Even the modest opening revenue of around $7 million falls well short of a theatrical break‑even point — especially once marketing, distribution, and operational costs are included.

However, some analysts contend that the controversy itself became a driver of cultural conversation — albeit one centered on ridicule and political polarization rather than artistic appreciation. Documentaries often thrive on becoming cultural touchstones, and Melania certainly achieved airtime.

Continue reading…

Leave a Comment